-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
What is use_aggressive_host_checking? #278
Comments
well, the reason is that naemon considers warnings as ok for host checks. Consider a Ping which results in a few packets lost so check_ping results in a warning. So Naemon assumes the host is still up, because a host can either be up or down and you either cut the line between ok and warning or warning and critical. |
But i agree, instead of letting people read the source, we could simply write into the docs, that warnings are considered |
From the docs:
Until now i thought Service states: May be a better name would be |
Signed-off-by: nook24 <[email protected]>
Update description of `use_aggressive_host_checking` in the sample configuration to clarify what effect it has on host states. Signed-off-by: nook24 <[email protected]>
Maybe I'm just missing something but is there a documentation available of what
use_aggressive_host_checking
is doing?naemon.cfg
suggests tocheck out the source code
which is not helpful at all.The reason i ask is. I created a check plugin like this for my host check:
My Host was always current_state=0 Up. It took me two hours to find out that
use_aggressive_host_checking=0
was the reason for this, so what the heck is this option about? Tested with Naemon 1.0.7 and 1.0.8.From the docs:
Naemon tries to be smart
. Is always Up really that smart? :)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: