- PLDI (https://www.sigplan.org/Conferences/PLDI/)
- POPL (https://www.sigplan.org/Conferences/POPL/)
- SPLASH (https://www.sigplan.org/Conferences/SPLASH/)
- ICSE (http://www.icse-conferences.org/)
- CC (https://conf.researchr.org/series/CC)
- CGO (https://conf.researchr.org/home/cgo-2024)
- ESEC (https://2020.esec-fse.org/)
- ASPLOS (https://www.sigplan.org/Conferences/ASPLOS/)
- paper meta data (authors, conference/section, year, number of pages, etc.)
- paper layout/sections
- feedback in the context of:
- problem statement (is research statement clear? does the problem sound relevant?)
- innovation (does the work bring any innovation ideas or methods?)
- contribution (what artifacts are produced by the work?)
- logical correcteness (are there any irrational, controversial or incorrect statments or conclusions?)
- proof of statements (are there any questional, unproven statments or conclusions?)
- readablity (are the key ideas/methods clear? is the content easy to read and understand?)
- any other notable points: what is good/interesting about the papers and what could be better.