Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Connect: wrong robot start state using STOMP planner #172

Open
captain-yoshi opened this issue Jun 9, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Connect: wrong robot start state using STOMP planner #172

captain-yoshi opened this issue Jun 9, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@captain-yoshi
Copy link
Contributor

captain-yoshi commented Jun 9, 2020

Is the STOMP planner compatible with MTC?

Using the STOMP planner for the first sub-task works fine. But for each subsequent connect stages, the starting robot state is the default UR3 state from the ur3_moveit_config, and not the the previous robot state. Notice that there are some information retained like the object that is attached to the tcp.

Setup configuration:

  • Master branch for MoveIt and MTC
  • Latest branch for stomp_ros
  • stomp_planning.yaml (same as panda except for stddev param)
  • The initial starting robot pose is given in the initial parameter in fake_controllers.yaml

For the same task I have uploaded 2 gifs. One using OMPL where the task is planned correctly. The other using STOMP with the wrong robot starting state on the second connect stage. (Click to collapse)

OMPL

ompl

STOMP

stomp

@v4hn
Copy link
Contributor

v4hn commented Jun 9, 2020

Thank you for reporting the issue. Could I ask you to prepare a minimal example?

captain-yoshi pushed a commit to captain-yoshi/moveit_task_constructor that referenced this issue Jun 10, 2020
@captain-yoshi
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have created this repo that contains a minimal example of the problem. The instructions are in the readme.

@captain-yoshi
Copy link
Contributor Author

The issue was with stomp_ros package. This pull request fixes this issue.

@v4hn
Copy link
Contributor

v4hn commented Jul 23, 2020

Thank you for debugging this! I added my review to that pull-request! 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants