Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clearer explanation to get to Eq. 10.21 #785

Open
clkim opened this issue Nov 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Clearer explanation to get to Eq. 10.21 #785

clkim opened this issue Nov 24, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@clkim
Copy link

clkim commented Nov 24, 2024

Describe the mistake
This is not a mistake per se; I do have a EE degree but am not a Math major, so self-taught in Math for ML, and

I spent a few days struggling to prove to myself the below equation step in the paragraph just before Equation 10.21.

(S − B_{m−1} S) b_i = Sb_i

found in the sentence:
In the case i ⩾ m, by using (10.20) in (10.19b), we obtain ˆS bi = (S −
Bm−1S)bi = Sbi = λibi, ...

Location
Please provide the

  1. version pdf, Draft (2024-01-15)
  2. Chapter 10
  3. page 324
  4. line number/equation number line number 5, paragraph above equation 10.21

Proposed solution
Show the intermediate steps:
(S − B_{m−1} S) b_i
= S b_i - B_{m-1} S b_i
= S b_i - B_{m-1} λ_i b_i
= S b_i - λ_i B_{m-1} b_i
= S b_i - λ_i (sum_{j=1}^{m-1} b_j b_j^T) b_i
= S b_i - λ_i (sum_{j=1}^{m-1} b_j 0) because b_j^T and b_i are orthogonal since i ⩾ m
= S b_i
= λ_i b_i

Additional context
N/A
P.S. I enjoy and would recommend the book so far, and appreciate the care and extra explanations that I could see have gone into the book so far.

@clkim clkim changed the title Better explanation to get to Equation 10.21 Clearer explanation to get to Eq. 10.21 Nov 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant