You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I chased down the refs further and concluded that there is a good chance Google will parse this site just fine. Reasons I think so:
your second reference, in which Google announced they are parsing Javascript to get as close to user experience as possible
When I go to Google webmaster tools, although I couldn't verify the site, it showed the site the way it actually looks.
Supposedly there is or will be a way to verify that the site is parsing correctly, but I can't get into the webmaster tools without verifying the site, so couldn't confirm that.
I think the best way to get the site visited is to get it referenced on multiple sites that Google visits. I'll post something on MMI now; posting another reference on the CF list will be good too. And we can ask Jonathan if the new CF site can include a link (when the FAQ is included, it will have a link).
I expect the site to start getting indexed within a month, likely much sooner.
Find some way for this so the tool starts appearing in results when people do google searches for CF names and related info.
Some initial refs:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: