Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

.result for train / test separately, or for resampling instances #730

Open
mb706 opened this issue Aug 16, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

.result for train / test separately, or for resampling instances #730

mb706 opened this issue Aug 16, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
Status: Needs Discussion We still need to think about what the solution should look like workshop

Comments

@mb706
Copy link
Collaborator

mb706 commented Aug 16, 2023

E.g.: make .result part of the $state? -- has some drawbacks and does not work for predictions, and may be incompatible with states that are "closed" (i.e. pipeop does not anticipate someone else adding things).
Have separate .result_train, .result_predict? Other drawbacks, e.g. only last run is saved.
Use specific PipeOpSave that saves result at specific point? Maybe a bit tedious to use.

Have to think about this.

@mb706 mb706 added the Status: Needs Discussion We still need to think about what the solution should look like label Aug 16, 2023
@mb706 mb706 added the workshop label Aug 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Needs Discussion We still need to think about what the solution should look like workshop
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant