-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allowed optimizers for Image Classification using Pytorch #516
Comments
Actually, the optimizers that we want to use are FusedLAMB, FusedSGD imported from apex.optimizers: from apex.optimizers import FusedLAMB, FusedSGD Would these be MLPerf-compliant? |
@sgpyc to keep me honest. The rules already call allow apex.optimizers.FusedSGD here |
3/23 update: The team is working on our own Fused Lars implementation for Pytorch. I should have a code to share for next week's meeting |
Here is the Fused Lars code: Please review that it is good to use |
Thanks, implementation looks good as long as nesterov momentum is not used (reference doesn't use nesterov) |
Currently, Image Classification/LARS/Pytorch combination lists no compliant optimizers.
However, 2.2 submission by Habana used what looks like FusedLars optimizer (their own implementation) for Pytorch on ResNet.
Does that mean that built-in FusedLars is MLPerf compliant for Image Classification?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: