We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Firstly, I would like to express my appreciation for the outstanding work you have been doing.
I have a couple of inquiries pertaining to the models and the fine-tuning process within the script:
Does the current 'test.py' script utilize both models, namely 2.7_80x80_MiniFASNetV2.pth and 4_0_0_80x80_MiniFASNetV1SE.pth?
In the context of fine-tuning, is it advisable or necessary to conduct the fine-tuning process for both models in order to achieve optimal results?
I appreciate your time and assistance in clarifying these queries.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, may I kindly inquire if you have knowledge on how to fine-tune 2.7_80x80_MiniFASNetV2.pth and 4_0_0_80x80_MiniFASNetV1SE.pth?
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Firstly, I would like to express my appreciation for the outstanding work you have been doing.
I have a couple of inquiries pertaining to the models and the fine-tuning process within the script:
Does the current 'test.py' script utilize both models, namely 2.7_80x80_MiniFASNetV2.pth and 4_0_0_80x80_MiniFASNetV1SE.pth?
In the context of fine-tuning, is it advisable or necessary to conduct the fine-tuning process for both models in order to achieve optimal results?
I appreciate your time and assistance in clarifying these queries.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: