You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I have some questions about Section "C.2. Experimental Details", in which you provide the key hyperparameters of the RAINCOAT algorithm. I noticed that in Table 5, 6, 7, and 8, the epoch for RAINCOAT and all comparison algorithms is 50. I found that in your code, you set the epoch of the Alignment and Correction stages of RAINCOAT to 50, which corresponds to E1=50 and E2=50 in the paper. This seems unfair because all comparison algorithms only iterate 50 epochs, while RAINCOAT iterates a total of 50+50=100 epochs. To ensure fairness, should E1+E2=50 be met?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Leopold2333
changed the title
Is it fair to iterate 50 times in both stages?
Is it fair to iterate 50 epochs separately in Alignment and Correction stages?
Jan 11, 2024
Hi, I have some questions about Section "C.2. Experimental Details", in which you provide the key hyperparameters of the RAINCOAT algorithm. I noticed that in Table 5, 6, 7, and 8, the epoch for RAINCOAT and all comparison algorithms is 50. I found that in your code, you set the epoch of the Alignment and Correction stages of RAINCOAT to 50, which corresponds to E1=50 and E2=50 in the paper. This seems unfair because all comparison algorithms only iterate 50 epochs, while RAINCOAT iterates a total of 50+50=100 epochs. To ensure fairness, should E1+E2=50 be met?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: