You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have some problems with reproducing the mAP value reported in your article for the DukeMTMC-reID dataset. Here are the results when I run the standard evaluation code provided by DukeMTMC-reID_evaluation. I used the trained Duke Dense201 model you have provided and here are my results:
single query: mAP = 0.674285, r1 precision = 0.843750
In your article you had reported a mAP of 80.0%. Could you please indicate if I have done anything wrong whilst running your model?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have some problems with reproducing the mAP value reported in your article for the DukeMTMC-reID dataset. Here are the results when I run the standard evaluation code provided by DukeMTMC-reID_evaluation. I used the trained Duke Dense201 model you have provided and here are my results:
single query: mAP = 0.674285, r1 precision = 0.843750
In your article you had reported a mAP of 80.0%. Could you please indicate if I have done anything wrong whilst running your model?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: