Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request of New Trial for DisableThirdPartyStoragePartitioning2 #17

Closed
jaissam10 opened this issue Sep 8, 2024 · 6 comments
Closed

Request of New Trial for DisableThirdPartyStoragePartitioning2 #17

jaissam10 opened this issue Sep 8, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@jaissam10
Copy link

jaissam10 commented Sep 8, 2024

Hi Team,

I’m currently working on an extension where we don’t utilize third-party cookies or storage partitioning, as the top-level site always begins with chrome-extension:<id>//<dynamic_URL>. However, we are now removing the prefix chrome-extension://<id> from the dynamic URL. This change results in a third-party context, and I have web-accessible resources on this page inside an iframe, which itself loads another iframe of my hosted CDN (https://abc.com).

Further details can be found here: privacysandbox/privacy-sandbox-dev-support#409

Could you please assist me with a trial token? I wasn’t enrolled in the previous V1 token program.

Thank you!

CC: @miketaylr

@miketaylr
Copy link
Owner

Could you please assist me with a trial token? I wasn’t enrolled in the previous V1 token program.

Unfortunately, renewals are only granted for sites that were previously enrolled (to intentionally limit the number of sites in the deprecation trial).

@jaissam10
Copy link
Author

@miketaylr, I would appreciate it if there is an alternative way to obtain the trial token, as it is important for us.

@jaissam10
Copy link
Author

@miketaylr, we are working on an extension within our organization. We request your approval to help us unlock it.

@miketaylr
Copy link
Owner

miketaylr commented Sep 10, 2024

Please see https://developers.google.com/privacy-sandbox/blog/storage-partitioning-deprecation-trial-renewal#eligibility_criteria_and_review_process which describes the criteria.

Can you explain why this need has only surfaced now, and not while the previous deprecation trial was available?

@jaissam10
Copy link
Author

jaissam10 commented Sep 10, 2024

Hi @miketaylr ,

Thanks for your response.

I understand that this pertains to renewals, but we have a new requirement that emerged later.

Currently, when opening a PDF, we load a Chrome extension page(chrome-extnsion:///....) that contains our CDN iframe, meaning no storage partitioning is applied.

However, we're now modifying our architecture. Going forward, when a PDF is opened, the URL will remain unchanged, and we'll embed an iframe for the Chrome extension page. This iframe will include a nested iframe from our CDN, displaying PDF data and additional features, provided the user has enabled the extension or granted access.

In this new setup, storage partitioning comes into play, and we're encountering some challenges with it.

Could you kindly provide a trial token while we continue to explore solutions for storage partitioning?

Thank you!

@miketaylr
Copy link
Owner

Could you kindly provide a trial token while we continue to explore solutions for storage partitioning?

I've added some comment in the internal deprecation trial application issue - it's probably easier to continue conversation there, thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants