Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Significant gap in evaluation results of Textdiffuser2 #1677

Open
AnqiGou opened this issue Dec 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Significant gap in evaluation results of Textdiffuser2 #1677

AnqiGou opened this issue Dec 22, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@AnqiGou
Copy link

AnqiGou commented Dec 22, 2024

Describe
Model I am using Textdiffuser-2:
I used your layout planner and t2i-full generative model to generate six sub-datasets of MARIOEval with a total of 5k+ images, which were evaluated using the tool for calculating FID and OCR results in Textdiffuser documentation. But I got a FID score of 42.10, which was very different from the results of the paper(33.66). When I tested the OCR results, I used MaskTextSpotterV3 respectively according to the instructions in the repository, and the accuracy of the results was about 32.33, which was very different from the results of the paper(57.58). Same accuracy using pp-ocrv4. What could be the reason? Are there any other notable details?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant