Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add semantics for QA types to have top and bottom thresholds #2

Open
chcorbato opened this issue May 13, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Add semantics for QA types to have top and bottom thresholds #2

chcorbato opened this issue May 13, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
@chcorbato

Comments

@chcorbato
Copy link
Contributor

Semantics for QA types to have top and bottom thresholds in the tomasys metamodel would allow to define also in tomasys corresponding SWRL rules that will apply to QAtypes individuals that are defined to ave such thresholds
@chcorbato chcorbato self-assigned this May 13, 2020
@chcorbato
Copy link
Contributor Author

For the moment I did not implement top-bottom thresholds semantics in tomasys, but simply added a case for the energy and safety cases in the selection of configurations in mros1_reasoner.py

(see meta-control/mc_mros_reasoner#25)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@chcorbato chcorbato

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@chcorbato