I like the idea of this. I would suggest just displaying an optional password input instead of a checkbox. But I'm fine with both!

Thought about this, too. We would need to indicate, that it’s an optional input/parameter, and explain what the password is meant for, e.g. “access password” or “password protection”; we probably can’t and shouldn’t do this via the placeholder text, as the <input type="password" /> placeholder text is and should(?) be concealed, i.e. each character be displayed as bullet point?

We could implement/test it as follows:

/write                      [+]  |  h2 + sub-menu button
                                 |  br
Name your item:                  |  h3
__________________               |  input type="text"
                                 |  br
Access password: (optional)      |  input type="checkbox" + h3 + italic “(optional)“
__________________               |  input type="password"
                                 |  br
<CANCEL>       <CREATE>          |  cancel/confirm button component

/write                      [+]  |  h2 + sub-menu button
                                 |  br
Name your item:                  |  h3
__________________               |  input type="text"
                                 |  br
Password protection: (optional)  |  input type="checkbox" + h3 + italic “(optional)“
__________________               |  input type="password"
                                 |  br
<CANCEL>       <CREATE>          |  cancel/confirm button component

Not happy with the (optional) placement; but I’m sure we’ll find some good place.

👍 No strong preference, but I'd choose option (1) with the checkbox.

EDIT: @andirueckel mentioned he'd like the checkbox to be a toggle. @aofn Maybe this is the chance to start embedding shadcn/ui components?

sounds good, also happy with a toggle

I'll create a draft PR for this

@aofn Well, I visually kinda like it, but also it feels wrong to use a toggle, i.e. “switch” to show/hide other UI elements.

There’s also the “accordion” and “collapsible” components which maybe are more suited for this purpose?