-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 442
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Duplicate mp3s in fma_full
?
#23
Comments
okay, tiny update: 56421 / 106574 (≈53%) do not have ID3 tags, so that's probably not a great avenue for sanity checking the track metadata CSV files. |
Thanks for the investigation @ejhumphrey. If I understood correctly, it meas that Are we sure to catch every exact duplicates with this method? I guess tracks could have the same audio with different metadata, or even encoded differently. Should we try to identify near duplicates as well? The dataset was last updated in May 2017 (updates are recorded in the "History" section of the Duplicates mean there was duplicate uploads on https://freemusicarchive.org (maybe by the same artist in different albums?). The For tracks where ID3 metadata didn't match the |
After some digging, I'm reasonably confident that there are a fair number of files that have at least one exact duplicate in the
fma_full
zipfile. This came up when I was trouble-shooting some weird behavior, and noticed that the ID3 metadata associated with a track didn't match the CSV file of track metadata, but did match a different row.Metadata matching is at best a wicked pain, so instead I took at look at which files match based on a hash of the bytestream:
This produces 105637 unique file hashes from 106574, with 105042 pointing to a single file.
I've reproduced this twice decompressing the zipfile, so I'm pretty sure it's nothing I did. That said, I also downloaded the dataset a long time ago (last summer, maybe?), and I'm curious if it's been updated at all?
I'm curious what might have caused this, and wonder if the 105k tracks without duplicates map to accurate metadata in the
raw_tracks.csv
file? I haven't had a chance to check the ID3 tag coverage yet, but that should be an easy thing to look into.for what it's worth, I also haven't looked at the smaller partitions, so I'm not sure if / how this might affect other uses of the dataset. Will follow up later if / when I learn more.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: