Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include meta-programming capabilities? #5

Open
kaneplusplus opened this issue Jun 13, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Include meta-programming capabilities? #5

kaneplusplus opened this issue Jun 13, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@kaneplusplus
Copy link

kaneplusplus commented Jun 13, 2019

I think this is a great comparison that maintains a level of objectivity we don't usually see with these types of comparisons.

Would it be worth including meta-programming facilities? I think R is far and away the winner and I think it's one of the core reasons R is able to facilitate the construction of DSLs (like a large portion of the tidyverse) in ways that are currently not possible in Python.

@matloff
Copy link
Owner

matloff commented Jun 13, 2019

I did mention metaprog. It might be interesting to add a comment re connection to the tidyverse.

@matloff matloff closed this as completed Jun 13, 2019
@matloff matloff reopened this Jun 14, 2019
@kaneplusplus
Copy link
Author

Sorry, this was an oversight on my part.

The MP-tidyverse connection might help people understand the reason tidyverse exists is because of the flexibility designed into R. Practically, the "base vs. tidyverse" debate is about programming style. Technically, it is a false dichotomy since it implies that you can have the tidyverse without R's core facilities.

@matloff
Copy link
Owner

matloff commented Jun 18, 2019

Yes, I suspect that some of those blindly praising the Tidyverse don't realize it's written in base R. :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants