Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Museeks 1.0 #220

Open
7 of 18 tasks
martpie opened this issue Sep 21, 2016 · 1 comment
Open
7 of 18 tasks

Museeks 1.0 #220

martpie opened this issue Sep 21, 2016 · 1 comment
Milestone

Comments

@martpie
Copy link
Owner

martpie commented Sep 21, 2016

Ok, let's talk about serious business now 😝

Museeks 1.0

This document is a draft, imagine the best codebase possible, all the features you'd like, best back-end/front-end implementation, everything... and let's discuss it here. I'm locking the discussion for now to avoid some pollution, and let's talk about it on specific issues/Gitter.

If the whole codebase has to change to have a nice software, I don't see any problem (Whole app IPC Q/A for example, external binaries... Everything can be discussed)

Put a +1 on the first post of any issue if you'd like to see it included.

Disclaimer

The first goal of Museeks is to focus on music, not tons add tons of heavy add-ons.

The focus of Museeks is:

  • Simplicity
  • Elegance
  • Decent features

What we (understand "I") don't want is:

  • Tons of features slowing down things that nobody uses
  • Ultra-specific features you can find in your niche favorite player

Essential features

These features must be done before Museeks 1.0 is released.

Great to have

Almost essential features, but not as important. They'd better be done to have a serious piece of software. They may need serious specifications though.

Good to have

Would be good to have them, but they are not "absolutely" mandatory.

Bonus

The development will not be focused on theses issues, and/or these issues need discussions first, but they remain good ideas.

To be discussed

  • ...

2.0 ?

@martpie martpie added this to the 1.0 milestone Sep 21, 2016
Repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 21, 2016
@YurySolovyov
Copy link
Collaborator

YurySolovyov commented Sep 21, 2016

I'd like to discuss some UI polish, I think current UI does it's job, but I kinda miss some space.
So, request from me:

  • Update UI to make it more modern and spacious. /cc @Suriteka - ideas?

Reorderable columns in TracksList #62

Does that includes the ability to sort by clicking on them? If not, we should add it.

Use the Web Audio API instead of the Audio API #128

I think this is needed for 1.0. Doing this change in 1.x can be risky. Also, it is kind of prerequisite for #114, in which I'm personally really interested.

Better system integration on Ubuntu/Gnome #93

Kind of stalled on work needed to be done in mpris-service module. /cc @emersion ?
I doubt we want to interact with dbus directly.
But we can at least add Tray icon.

Installers #100

I thought this is for 0.8, but yeah, that would help people to get up and running anyway, I'm all in.

(sorry about poking in closed thread.)

@martpie martpie removed the draft label Feb 17, 2019
@martpie martpie pinned this issue Dec 16, 2020
Repository owner unlocked this conversation Feb 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants