We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In
:role:`text`
and
`text`:role:
(see http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#interpreted-text, both are equivalent), it would be nice if the role was not spellchecked (and possibly highlighted differently, perhaps fainter (of course that depends on the colorscheme and may be more controversial)).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As a note for whoever tries to implement this (perhaps a future me), make sure not to confuse with field lists: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/user/rst/quickref.html#field-lists
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
In
and
(see http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#interpreted-text, both are equivalent), it would be nice if the role was not spellchecked (and possibly highlighted differently, perhaps fainter (of course that depends on the colorscheme and may be more controversial)).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: