Organizer : Daniel Wheeler
Attendees : - Daniel Wheeler (he/him)
- David Montiel (he/him)
- Stephen DeWitt (he/him)
- Kasra Momeni (he/him)
- Trevor Keller (they/them), NIST
- Austyn Nguyen
- Google Meet
- WG GitHub repository
- Google Docs
- Previous meeting notes
- Proposal document
- Resource links
- Overleaf publication
- Any questions or items to raise for discussion (please add)
- Reminders
- Next office hours:
- 2024-08-02, Friday, 11AM ET
- 2024-08-16, Friday, 11AM ET
- Next WG meet
- 2024-08-28, Wednesday, 12-noon ET
- Next office hours:
- Current state of the RO-Crate example (work with Austyn Nguyen)
- We are a lot more comfortable with RO-Crate and the possibilities
- New RO-Crate example
- HTML view of RO-Crate
- Graph view
- The benchmark spec is included alongside an environment file, inputs and outputs as well.
CreateAction
is the top level entity for the actual workflow- See this for more descriptions of how it works
- Bioschemas also used for
ComputationalTool
- We can push any new schema to be a subset of Workflow run ro-crate here
- However, this is not always necessary
- DefinedTerm gives a lot of possibilities
- I think we need to think about adding a
specification
orproblemDefinition
field to the top-level of the exisisting RO-Crate terms. Possibly augement aDataset
to have agoverningEquations
field. - The existing RO-Crate extra terms
- Notice that these have a lot of possibilities to add containers
- A lot of the existing augmentations for Workflow run are for
CreateAction
, which I've demonstrated works well for our needs.
- Gave a short presentation to the Workflow Run RO-Crate group about our use case and recieved some usefule feedback.
- Galaxy's tutorial: RO-Crate - Introduction
- Ideas