You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am new to mitochondrial genome assemblies and currently working on a complex fungal mitogenome. I have encountered a peculiar situation and would appreciate your opinion on it, if possible.
The reference genome comes from a congeneric species and is circularized and approximately 280 Kb long due to a significant number of introns. However, the assembled mitogenome failed to circularize and resulted in an assembly of approximately 400 Kb, featuring a significant tandem duplication of around 100 Kb. The duplicated segments are 99.64% identical. See Panel A for a self-alignment and Panel B for a comparison with the reference genome. Based on the alignment between the two genomes I also suspect that the genome is complete even if circularization failed.
No uniquely mapped reads are present within the tandem duplication, and there is also a noticeable drop in coverage at the boundaries between the two copies, with only a few reads mapping.
When removing the tandem duplication, the coverage looks fine to me
I suspect that the tandem duplication is an assembly artifact. Am I interpreting these results correctly? Is it possible that only the few reads mapping between the copies are causing hifiasm to assemble them separately?
Thanks,
Jacopo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear MitoHiFi developers,
I am new to mitochondrial genome assemblies and currently working on a complex fungal mitogenome. I have encountered a peculiar situation and would appreciate your opinion on it, if possible.
MitoHiFi was executed with the following code:
mitohifi.py -r Tlat_hifi.fastq.gz -f NC_053885.1.fasta -g NC_053885.1.gb -t 10 -o 4 -a fungi
The reference genome comes from a congeneric species and is circularized and approximately 280 Kb long due to a significant number of introns. However, the assembled mitogenome failed to circularize and resulted in an assembly of approximately 400 Kb, featuring a significant tandem duplication of around 100 Kb. The duplicated segments are 99.64% identical. See Panel A for a self-alignment and Panel B for a comparison with the reference genome. Based on the alignment between the two genomes I also suspect that the genome is complete even if circularization failed.
MitoGenome_Comparison.pdf
No uniquely mapped reads are present within the tandem duplication, and there is also a noticeable drop in coverage at the boundaries between the two copies, with only a few reads mapping.
When removing the tandem duplication, the coverage looks fine to me
I suspect that the tandem duplication is an assembly artifact. Am I interpreting these results correctly? Is it possible that only the few reads mapping between the copies are causing hifiasm to assemble them separately?
Thanks,
Jacopo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: