-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DOC: Show very simple usage and benchmark against continuum/miniconda3 #488
Comments
corneliusroemer
changed the title
DOC: Show very simple usage
DOC: Show very simple usage and benchmark against continuum/miniconda3
Jun 3, 2024
Yes, we could do a better job of showing the performance advantages. Would you be up for making a documentation pull request? |
I'm really sorry but I'm already procrastinating too much 🙃 I can't commit to doing it, happy for you to reuse whatever I've written above without need to attribute (other than mention in PR) Here's the jupyter example translated to work with micromamba-docker:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I was asked why I prefer micromamba-docker over continuum/miniconda3.
Miniconda shows this very simple command on their readme, i love it:
No need for dockerfile, just run this snippet.
Among the advantages for micromamba are:
I tested speed, and indeed it is! I think you could add this to the docs to show a) how simple it is to use the container, and b) that it is more performant than miniconda
Micromamba:
In addition this, the pull time is of course much shorter for micromamba (20 seconds for miniconda on 100Mbps, vs 3 seconds for micromamba)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: