Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More statistics to consider #3

Open
5 of 8 tasks
m-clark opened this issue Sep 16, 2019 · 0 comments
Open
5 of 8 tasks

More statistics to consider #3

m-clark opened this issue Sep 16, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@m-clark
Copy link
Owner

m-clark commented Sep 16, 2019

While I think there is already enough for most needs, we can always add more if they are straightforward to calculate. If so, perhaps this should be an optional argument with default to FALSE.

  • Yule/Phi (will not call it Matthews!)
  • Tetrachoric correlation (probably not due to heavy lifting)
  • AUC (see psych implementation)
  • d'
  • Peirce's coefficient (because he was awesome)
  • Jaccard (still notably used in some disciplines)
  • Odds ratio
  • Others

Possibly separate correlation coefficients
Preference for those that are zero if statistically independent

See this historical overview for a ridiculous number of things to calculate: A Survey of Binary Similarity and Distance Measures Seung-Seok Choi, Sung-Hyuk Cha, Charles C. Tappert

Also:
Warrens, Matthijs (2008), On Association Coefficients for 2x2 Tables and Properties That Do Not Depend on the Marginal Distributions.

@m-clark m-clark self-assigned this Sep 16, 2019
@m-clark m-clark added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 16, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant