Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include name spaces to complement exclude name spaces #41

Open
cjohnsonuk opened this issue Jun 1, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Include name spaces to complement exclude name spaces #41

cjohnsonuk opened this issue Jun 1, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@cjohnsonuk
Copy link

It would be great to be able to limit the search scope for the wanted/orphaned page search to a particular name space in the opposite way that you can exclude name spaces. I have different people manage different sections of the site. Each section has an admin page listing the pages that are within that namespace, any tasks from that namespace (Using todo) and , at the moment, all the missing pages from all the sections because there are too many sections to exclude them all manually and change those links every time a new namespace is added. I either want to set it to look in a named namespace (absolute or relative) or say 'from here down' based on the namespace of the page the wanted page markup is on.
This seems a fairly obvious thing to include by maybe tweaking the exclude name space syntax and reversing the logic but I'm thinking that if this was the case it would already be a function. Is there something technical that makes this an issue that is not easy to add? If its there's no 'gotcha' that I've overlooked I'll give it a go myself but I want to avoid getting half way through only to find the reason its not already been added..

Thanks for the great work so far! :-)

@jaller94
Copy link
Collaborator

jaller94 commented Jul 7, 2021

This plugin is unmaintained, Pull Requests are welcome.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants