Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug] SD最新版本模型浏览器需要重新适配 #544

Open
4 tasks done
ZhiQiu-Kinsey opened this issue Mar 2, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
4 tasks done

[Bug] SD最新版本模型浏览器需要重新适配 #544

ZhiQiu-Kinsey opened this issue Mar 2, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
🐛 Bug Something isn't working | 缺陷 Inactive

Comments

@ZhiQiu-Kinsey
Copy link

👀 检查清单 | Initial checklist

  • 已经阅读了 常见问题 | I have read the FAQ
  • 插件和 SD WebUI 均为为最新版本 | Plugin and SD WebUI both are the latest version
  • 插件的分支为 main | The branch of the plugin is main
  • 在单独开启插件的情况下,问题仍然存在 | The problem still exists when the plugin is turned on separately

💻 系统环境 | Operating System

Windows

🌐 浏览器 | Browser

Chrome

📦 SD Wbui 版本或提交 | Version or Commit

1.8

📦 Lobe Theme 版本或提交 | Version or Commit

最新版

🐛 问题描述 | Bug Description

最新版本的sd,右侧的模型以及lora浏览器,启用树状文件夹时文件夹显示过窄。
image
以及每一项的高度过高
image

🚦 期望结果 | Expected Behavior

优化显示

📷 复现步骤 | Recurrence Steps

侧边栏的额外信息

📝 补充信息 | Additional Information

No response

@ZhiQiu-Kinsey ZhiQiu-Kinsey added the 🐛 Bug Something isn't working | 缺陷 label Mar 2, 2024
@lobehubbot
Copy link
Member

👀 @ZhiQiu-Kinsey

Thank you for raising an issue. We will investigate into the matter and get back to you as soon as possible.
Please make sure you have given us as much context as possible.
非常感谢您提交 issue。我们会尽快调查此事,并尽快回复您。 请确保您已经提供了尽可能多的背景信息。

@ZhiQiu-Kinsey ZhiQiu-Kinsey changed the title [Bug] 请取一个问题概要描述标题 | Please take a brief description of the title [Bug] SD最新版本模型浏览器需要重新适配 Mar 3, 2024
@Andy-linux
Copy link

f21cb5a17874db0a8a6b51208dffb259
中间的条子不能拉动,为了完全展示路径文件夹名 右侧栏需要的画面占比过大

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🐛 Bug Something isn't working | 缺陷 Inactive
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants