Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

cansend remote request only works every other time #405

Open
bigguiness opened this issue Feb 6, 2023 · 29 comments
Open

cansend remote request only works every other time #405

bigguiness opened this issue Feb 6, 2023 · 29 comments

Comments

@bigguiness
Copy link

bigguiness commented Feb 6, 2023 •
edited by marckleinebudde
Loading

I am trying to test a CAN interface on a Zynq board and have problems with cansend remote requests.

# candump can0 &
[1] 659
# cansend can0 001#R
# cansend can0 001#R
  can0  001   [0]  remote request
  can0  001   [0]  remote request
  can0  001   [2]  00 01
# cansend can0 001#R
# cansend can0 001#R
  can0  001   [0]  remote request
  can0  001   [0]  remote request
  can0  001   [2]  00 01

But, non remote requests always work:

# cansend can0 002#0000
  can0  002   [2]  00 00
  can0  004   [0] 
# cansend can0 002#0001
  can0  002   [2]  00 01
  can0  004   [0]

Any ideas?
@bigguiness
Copy link
Author

well... that formatted badly...

@marckleinebudde
Copy link
Member

fixed formatting - use 3 backticks instead of 1 for multi line code

@marckleinebudde
Copy link
Member

Use candump any,0:0,#FFFFFFFF -cexdtA to get more information.

Looking at your output:

# cansend can0 001#R
# cansend can0 001#R
  can0  001   [0]  remote request
  can0  001   [0]  remote request

You sent 2 remote requests....

  can0  001   [2]  00 01

...but only receive 1 answer. But you expect 2 answers - is this the problem?

Who is sending the answer to the RTR messages? Can you add a 2nd CAN adapter to the bus to see if can0 properly sends 2 RTR messages?

@bigguiness
Copy link
Author

bigguiness commented Feb 7, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Thanks for the reply.

Yes, I was expecting an answer for each request.

I have an Arduino based device connected to the CAN bus that receives the message and answers. It is only seeing the 2nd message.

I also have a logic analyzer connected to the CAN TX/RX signals going to the transceiver and a oscilloscope connected to the CANH/CANL output of the transceiver. On the first RTR message I see no activity. For the second RTR I see expected activity n both the LA and scope.

The weird thing is it only happens for the RTR messages...

root@s6:/proc# candump any,0:0,#FFFFFFFF -cexdtA &
[1] 945
root@s6:/proc# cansend can0 003#R
root@s6:/proc# cansend can0 003#R
 (2023-02-07 07:18:45.626450)  can0  TX - -  003   [0]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 07:18:45.626452)  can0  TX - -  003   [0]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 07:18:45.626779)  can0  RX - -  003   [3]  07 00 00
root@s6:/proc# cansend can0 002#5555
 (2023-02-07 07:18:54.095936)  can0  TX - -  002   [2]  55 55
 (2023-02-07 07:18:54.096142)  can0  RX - -  004   [0] 
root@s6:/proc# cansend can0 003#R
root@s6:/proc# cansend can0 003#R
 (2023-02-07 07:19:00.175716)  can0  TX - -  003   [0]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 07:19:00.175719)  can0  TX - -  003   [0]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 07:19:00.176056)  can0  RX - -  003   [3]  07 55 55
root@s6:/proc# cansend can0 002#aaaa
 (2023-02-07 07:19:06.345800)  can0  TX - -  002   [2]  AA AA
 (2023-02-07 07:19:06.346013)  can0  RX - -  004   [0] 
root@s6:/proc# cansend can0 003#R
root@s6:/proc# cansend can0 003#R
 (2023-02-07 07:19:10.505904)  can0  TX - -  003   [0]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 07:19:10.505906)  can0  TX - -  003   [0]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 07:19:10.506226)  can0  RX - -  003   [3]  07 AA AA
root@s6:/proc# cansend can0 002#0000
 (2023-02-07 07:19:16.755913)  can0  TX - -  002   [2]  00 00
 (2023-02-07 07:19:16.756145)  can0  RX - -  004   [0] 
root@s6:/proc# cansend can0 003#R
root@s6:/proc# cansend can0 003#R
 (2023-02-07 07:19:22.925631)  can0  TX - -  003   [0]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 07:19:22.925634)  can0  TX - -  003   [0]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 07:19:22.925959)  can0  RX - -  003   [3]  07 00 00
root@s6:/proc#

@hartkopp
Copy link
Member

hartkopp commented Feb 7, 2023

Your two sent RTR frames are sent with nearly no time gap - definitely much faster than you can invoke the second cansend on the terminal. Is it possible that the Arduino ot its CAN transceiver is in some sleep mode?

What happens if you send some other CAN frame right before the RTR frames?

@bigguiness
Copy link
Author

Same result.

My Arduino code does not sleep. It just loops checking for can messages and then processes them.

The Arduino board is a simple CAN connected GPIO expander with 16 outputs and 8 inputs.

001#R is a "version" request, expected response is 001 [2] 00 01 (0x0100 = 1.0)
002#lohi is "set output" command, where lo sets outputs 0-7 and hi sets outputs 8-15, expected response is 004 [0] (ACK)
003#R is a "query" command, expected response is 003 [3] in lo hi, where in is the input 0-7 state and lo hi is the current output 0-7, 8-15 state

The Arduino board works fine with another system (PowerPC based, not sure what driver is used off hand).

I'm trying to test the CAN interface on a Xilinx Zynq based system using the xilinx_can driver. It seems to be working other than needing two 'sendcan' messages for every remote request.

It seems like the first 'sendcan' doesn't actually do anything. 'ifconfig' does not show any increase in the TX or RX bytes for the first request. On the second request I see the TX and RX bytes increment.

Confused...

@bigguiness
Copy link
Author

Also, if I do the first 'cansend', which does not do anything, and then wait a couple minutes before doing the second 'cansend' I still get the candump output showing the two RTR frames with nearly no time gap.

root@s6:/proc# cansend can0 001#R
 (2023-02-07 11:21:29.565825)  can0  TX - -  001   [0]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 11:21:29.565828)  can0  TX - -  001   [0]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 11:21:29.566113)  can0  RX - -  001   [2]  00 01

@bigguiness
Copy link
Author

Maybe this will help.

xilinx_can e0008000.can can0: bitrate error 0.0%
root@s6:~# ifconfig can0 up
IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): can0: link becomes ready
root@s6:~# ifconfig can0   
can0      Link encap:UNSPEC  HWaddr 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00  
          UP RUNNING NOARP  MTU:16  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:10 
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
          Interrupt:21 

root@s6:~# candump any,0:0,#FFFFFFFF -cexdtA &
[1] 538
root@s6:~# cansend can0 001#R
root@s6:~# ifconfig can0
can0      Link encap:UNSPEC  HWaddr 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00  
          UP RUNNING NOARP  MTU:16  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:10 
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
          Interrupt:21 

root@s6:~# cansend can0 001#R
 (2023-02-07 11:32:15.427178)  can0  TX - -  001   [0]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 11:32:15.427181)  can0  TX - -  001   [0]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 11:32:15.427466)  can0  RX - -  001   [2]  00 01
root@s6:~# ifconfig can0
can0      Link encap:UNSPEC  HWaddr 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00  
          UP RUNNING NOARP  MTU:16  Metric:1
          RX packets:1 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:10 
          RX bytes:2 (2.0 B)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
          Interrupt:21

The fist cansend does not show any TX packets in the ifconfig output.
The second shows 2 TX packets and 1 RX packet.

@marckleinebudde
Copy link
Member

marckleinebudde commented Feb 7, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Ok, let's check systematically. Can you get some rough timestamps with a 2nd system, maybe with the Arduino?

In one terminal start candump any,0:0,#FFFFFFFF -cexdtA, in another terminal start the following:

# 64 CAN Frames
cangen can0 -Ii -Li -p 10 -n64

# 64 RTR CAN Frames
cangen can0 -Ii -Li -p 10 -n64 -R

You should see 64 CAN frames, 1 about every 200ms (data is random):

 (2023-02-07 20:06:34.652177)  mcp251xfd0  TX - -  000   [0] 
 (2023-02-07 20:06:34.852589)  mcp251xfd0  TX - -  001   [1]  FE
 (2023-02-07 20:06:35.052919)  mcp251xfd0  TX - -  002   [2]  F9 0F
 (2023-02-07 20:06:35.253225)  mcp251xfd0  TX - -  003   [3]  3C 7D 08
 (2023-02-07 20:06:35.453543)  mcp251xfd0  TX - -  004   [4]  F6 DB 3C 06
 (2023-02-07 20:06:35.653867)  mcp251xfd0  TX - -  005   [5]  41 5C E0 38 BC
 (2023-02-07 20:06:35.854190)  mcp251xfd0  TX - -  006   [6]  1F A7 50 3A 10 2F
 (2023-02-07 20:06:36.054500)  mcp251xfd0  TX - -  007   [7]  6D 8A 32 44 66 3A A9
 (2023-02-07 20:06:36.254814)  mcp251xfd0  TX - -  008   [8]  EC 5E 71 2C 00 48 6E 1A

Then 64 RTR CAN Frames:

 (2023-02-07 20:07:35.191925)  mcp251xfd0  TX - -  000   [0]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 20:07:35.392334)  mcp251xfd0  TX - -  001   [1]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 20:07:35.592619)  mcp251xfd0  TX - -  002   [2]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 20:07:35.792916)  mcp251xfd0  TX - -  003   [3]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 20:07:35.993219)  mcp251xfd0  TX - -  004   [4]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 20:07:36.193508)  mcp251xfd0  TX - -  005   [5]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 20:07:36.393795)  mcp251xfd0  TX - -  006   [6]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 20:07:36.594091)  mcp251xfd0  TX - -  007   [7]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 20:07:36.794387)  mcp251xfd0  TX - -  008   [8]  remote request

Compare the output of candump with the Arduino.

@bigguiness
Copy link
Author

I will need to modify my Arduino code to produce some kind of timestamp.

I the mean time I did notice this:

root@s6:~# cansend can0 001#R
# no response, now request the 'status'
root@s6:~# cansend can0 003#R
 (2023-02-07 12:37:27.676845)  can0  TX - -  001   [0]  remote request   # sent the 'version' request
 (2023-02-07 12:37:27.676847)  can0  TX - -  003   [0]  remote request   # sent the 'status' request
 (2023-02-07 12:37:27.677136)  can0  RX - -  001   [2]  00 01                  # response was the 'version'
# request the 'status'
root@s6:~# cansend can0 003#R
# no response, request the 'verison'
root@s6:~# cansend can0 001#R
 (2023-02-07 12:38:48.896847)  can0  TX - -  003   [0]  remote request  # sent the 'status' request
 (2023-02-07 12:38:48.896850)  can0  TX - -  001   [0]  remote request  # sent the 'version request'
 (2023-02-07 12:38:48.897183)  can0  RX - -  003   [3]  07 D0 CD           # response was the 'status'

Is there some kind of buffering of the remote requests?

@marckleinebudde
Copy link
Member

marckleinebudde commented Feb 7, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Is there some kind of buffering of the remote requests?

Seems so - but that's a bug.

Can you send a bug report to [email protected], add Appana Durga Kedareswara rao <[email protected]> and Naga Sureshkumar Relli <[email protected]> on Cc.

@bigguiness
Copy link
Author

Never actually submitted a bug report. What is supposed to be included?

@marckleinebudde
Copy link
Member

marckleinebudde commented Feb 7, 2023 •
edited
Loading

@bigguiness
Copy link
Author

The text only is a problem. My work has seriously screwed up our mail server. Everything gets converted to HTML.

I'll try to figure it out.

@bigguiness
Copy link
Author

Hmmm... Non RTR messages work fine:

root@s6:~# cansend can0 001#R
 (2023-02-07 13:16:51.216848)  can0  TX - -  001   [0]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 13:16:51.216851)  can0  TX - -  001   [0]  remote request
 (2023-02-07 13:16:51.217139)  can0  RX - -  001   [2]  00 01
root@s6:~# cansend can0 001# 
 (2023-02-07 13:17:06.347146)  can0  TX - -  001   [0] 
 (2023-02-07 13:17:06.347433)  can0  RX - -  001   [2]  00 01

Is the 001# message actually valid?

@marckleinebudde
Copy link
Member

marckleinebudde commented Feb 7, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Is the 001# message actually valid?

Yes, you can send messages without data. Seems the other side doesn't care if it's a RTR or not?

@hartkopp
Copy link
Member

hartkopp commented Feb 7, 2023

@marckleinebudde would it make sense for one of us to simply write this bug report and put Hartley and his e-mail in CC?
The code in https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c#L633 really looks tricky as the bitstream engine has a pretty unusual register layout.

@marckleinebudde
Copy link
Member

@hartkopp Good idea, feel free to forward the bug report, include a link to this issue.

@bigguiness
Copy link
Author

Must not. The Arduino board is a Teensy 3.2 and I'm just using the can libraries provided by the Teensyduino support for that board.

My PowerPC code that uses the board always sent the RTR message so I assumed it was needed.

@marckleinebudde
Copy link
Member

If you handle all messages on the Teensy in software you can check if the RTR bit is set in you RX-Handler and decide to handle it somehow "special". With some controllers you can "pre-load" a message into the controller. It's send automatically by the CAN controller hardware once it receives a certain CAN-ID + RTR bit set.

@bigguiness
Copy link
Author

bigguiness commented Feb 7, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Ah, I'm not doing that on the Teensy. Basically it's just doing:

  CAN_message_t msg;

  updateInputs();

  if (can0.read(msg)) {
    switch (msg.id) {
    case 0x001:    sendVersion();  break;
    case 0x002:    setOutputs(msg, 0x004);  break;    // 0x004 is the ACK response
    case 0x003:    sendStatus();   break;
    default;
      break;
    }
  }
}

Simple, stupid, but it works...

@marckleinebudde
Copy link
Member

so no one's looking at the RTR bit :)

@bigguiness
Copy link
Author

Guess not. But still probably a bug in the xilinx driver.

Thanks for all your help!

@marckleinebudde
Copy link
Member

For the reference: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]

@hartkopp
Copy link
Member

hartkopp commented Feb 7, 2023

Guess not. But still probably a bug in the xilinx driver.

This could be either a bug in the driver - or even in the xilinx CAN IP core.
Let's see.
Many thanks for the report!

@marckleinebudde
Copy link
Member

marckleinebudde commented Feb 7, 2023 •
edited
Loading

@bigguiness are you using a hardware xilinx CAN core or one in the FPGA?

@bigguiness
Copy link
Author

bigguiness commented Feb 7, 2023 •
edited by marckleinebudde
Loading

The hardware CAN.

Also, this is with a kernel/rootfs created using Petalinux 2020.2.

root@s6:~# uname -a
Linux s6 5.4.0-xilinx-v2020.2 #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Feb 3 17:27:45 UTC 2023 armv7l GNU/Linux

@marckleinebudde
Copy link
Member

FYI: opening and closing backticks go into separate lines.

@sneeli-git
Copy link

Hi,

Thanks for letting us know,
We are able to reproduce the issue on our end.
we are looking into it. Will get back to you.

Thanks
Neeli Srinivas

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@bigguiness @marckleinebudde @hartkopp @sneeli-git