Use goo[gle]d C++

[uselessgoddess]

Check this links and fixes translator
always use explicit constructor
always use explicit operator conversions

bonus:
use next structure to translate constructors

public: constructor(integral_type a, non_integral_type b) noexcept ( /* if body is empty */ )
    : a(a), b(std::move(b)) // or _a(a), _b(std::move(b))
{
}

[Konard]

We have C# code that relies on implicit operator conversions.
Maybe we should make a decision about operator conversions in a different issue?

I agree that we can use explicit constructors.

[uselessgoddess]

This does not affect the result. It is better to abandon implicit operators
In C++, this can be dangerous

Constructors and operators are very similar