You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The Profiles ballot (SC-062, enacted as BRs v2.0.0) completely overhauled Section 7: Profiles of the BRs. We should update our CPS to mirror this new structure.
In general, the new structure consists of a series of tables, each of which has columns for:
a specific certificate field, extension, or enum value
when that item MUST/MUST NOT/etc be present
other metadata such as whether it should be marked critical
I propose that ours take the form of tables with the exact same titles, only the subset of rows which appear in our certificates (i.e. exclude rows which do not appear), and only one column indicating what values that item takes in our certificates.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The Profiles ballot (SC-062, enacted as BRs v2.0.0) completely overhauled Section 7: Profiles of the BRs. We should update our CPS to mirror this new structure.
In general, the new structure consists of a series of tables, each of which has columns for:
I propose that ours take the form of tables with the exact same titles, only the subset of rows which appear in our certificates (i.e. exclude rows which do not appear), and only one column indicating what values that item takes in our certificates.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: