Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New genome and annotations for Cercis canadensis (two haplotypes) #209

Open
10 of 14 tasks
StevenCannon-USDA opened this issue Jul 15, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
10 of 14 tasks

Comments

@StevenCannon-USDA
Copy link

StevenCannon-USDA commented Jul 15, 2024

Main steps for adding new genome and annotation collections

Genus/species/collection names:

Haplotype 1:

  • Cercis/canadensis/genomes/ISC453364.gnm3.GWXB
  • Cercis/canadensis/annotations/ISC453364.gnm3.ann1.3N1M

Haplotype 2:

  • Cercis/canadensis/genomes/ISC453364.gnm3_hap2.2S7P

  • Cercis/canadensis/annotations/ISC453364.gnm3_hap2.ann1.G88H

  • Add collection(s) to the Data Store, including commits to datastore-metadata

  • Validate the README(s)

  • Update about_this_collection.yml

  • Calculate AHRD functional annotations

  • Calculate gene family assignments (.gfa)

  • Add to pan-gene set

  • Load relevant mine

  • Add BLAST targets

  • Incorporate into GCV

  • Update the jekyll collections listing

  • Update browser configs

  • run BUSCO

  • Update DSCensor

  • Add LINKOUTS to datastore, refresh linkout service

@adf-ncgr
Copy link
Contributor

@StevenCannon-USDA can you clarify, it looks like we already have hap1 represented in the main datastore from quite some time ago (as well as downstream apps). AFAICT hap1 genome sequences and the corresponding annotations have not changed (haven't looked at this exhaustively though). Can you confirm that hap1 needs no updating and this issue is just about pulling in hap2?

@StevenCannon-USDA
Copy link
Author

@adf-ncgr You are right. I prepared hap1 in April 2023. Comparing those annotation files to the new C. canadensis hap1 files, they appear to be the same -- at least at the level of word counts etc.

I made a more careful record of notes this time around, and of course made the hap2 files (which I hadn't done in 2023). But apart from that, I guess we can leave the hap1 files as-is (though I'll probably check the old and new READMEs and may update the hap1 file).

@adf-ncgr
Copy link
Contributor

sounds good- my main goal in asking was to avoid having to redo any of the AHRD+downstream on hap1 if possible so I think we are on the same page...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants