You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was looking for an option to output intel syntax with -output-s, and only found this because ldmd pushes this flag for -vasm. It would be nice if this option were more discoverable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The --x86-asm-syntax=intel option is an LLVM option (meaning it is probably "expert" usage, and it is also available to Clang), and I don't think LDC should document such options; LDC should not be documenting LLVM, because it will quietly bitrot.
I guess one could argue that LDC should add the -masm=intel option. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10990018/how-to-generate-assembly-code-with-clang-in-intel-syntax
Maybe instead of documenting it as its own flag, mention it in the description of -output-s. LDC already depends on the flag through ldmd, so I don't think it increases the 'bitrot surface', but if this is meant to stay undocumented, that's also fair.
I was looking for an option to output intel syntax with
-output-s
, and only found this becauseldmd
pushes this flag for-vasm
. It would be nice if this option were more discoverable.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: