Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Change the default format to DATE_ATOM in DateTimeFormatter #7

Closed
weierophinney opened this issue Dec 31, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Change the default format to DATE_ATOM in DateTimeFormatter #7

weierophinney opened this issue Dec 31, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
@gsteel
Labels
BC Break
Milestone
3.0.0

Comments

@weierophinney
Copy link
Member

Is there any reason why DateTime::ISO8601 is still used in DateTimeFormatter?

Taken from the docs:

DateTime::ISO8601
DATE_ISO8601
ISO-8601 (example: 2005-08-15T15:52:01+0000)
Note: This format is not compatible with ISO-8601, but is left this way for backward compatibility reasons. Use DateTime::ATOM or DATE_ATOM for compatibility with ISO-8601 instead.

DateTime::ATOM
DATE_ATOM
Atom (example: 2005-08-15T15:52:01+00:00)

Originally posted by @geerteltink at zendframework/zend-filter#58
@weierophinney
Copy link
Member Author

Most likely BC compliance: changing it would be a major BC break...

Originally posted by @Ocramius at zendframework/zend-filter#58 (comment)

@weierophinney weierophinney mentioned this issue Dec 31, 2019
Open
@gsteel gsteel changed the title DateTimeFormatter Change the default format to DATE_ATOM in DateTimeFormatter Nov 6, 2022
@gsteel gsteel added this to the 3.0.0 milestone Nov 6, 2022
@gsteel gsteel self-assigned this Sep 3, 2024
@gsteel
Copy link
Member

gsteel commented Sep 3, 2024

Resolved via #160

@gsteel gsteel closed this as completed Sep 3, 2024
@gsteel gsteel removed Documentation Needed Bug Something isn't working labels Nov 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@gsteel gsteel

Labels
BC Break
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.0.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@weierophinney @gsteel