Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LMC-14 #time 3h - Blog was written about what is Fineuploader and how… #27

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 11, 2017

Conversation

hamdibayhan
Copy link
Contributor

… to use Fineuploader

@tayfunoziserikan tayfunoziserikan merged commit 86fe1ae into develop Apr 11, 2017
@rnicholus
Copy link

Thanks for the mention. Nice article!

@hamdibayhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rnicholus We like Fineuploader as a Rails user, but I don't understand why does not the Rails logo look in the following logos found on the main page of Fineuploader?
fineuploader

@rnicholus
Copy link

Simple: no one has contributed a server side example for Rails to the GitHub org, thats why.

@hamdibayhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rnicholus You are wrong, there is react fineuploder example with Rails in here made by @Panczo . I think this example is enough for Rails logo. We are also thinking about creating an example with Rails for fineuploader. If we make the example, we'll inform you.

@rnicholus
Copy link

I stand corrected. Guess I forgot about that repo. If you are able to contribute an updated image that contains the Rails logo, I'd be happy to make it live. The image is at https://github.com/FineUploader/fineuploader.com/blob/gh-pages/img/server-support.png.

@hamdibayhan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rnicholus I will contribute for this issue as soon as possible. As I say, we like fineuploader. :)

@azimcan azimcan deleted the feature/use_fineuploader branch August 21, 2023 11:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants