-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Burrs on the calculation result curve #3
Comments
How long is your line? is this on real or simulated data? |
if this is simulated data, is it correlated? ie same datapoints. Same applies to real VNA data, it needs to be the same frequency points for TRL to work in this matter. |
It is simulated data. "T" is a zero length line, "R" is two short line.(the code is used for open and I modify it like below,"L" is a long line with 60-100 degree phase difference to "T". I think they all satisfy the TRL calibration requirement. By the way, would you please tell me how can I show the figure to you? I don't find any like "insert picture button" , thank you. %%%% the modified code%%%%% % An short is used for the reflection measurement. Use this information to if R1b>0 %because reflect coefficient of terminal one with the other terminal shorted is -1 if R1b<0 |
I will need to see your files, please upload them into a github repo: http://kbroman.org/github_tutorial/pages/init.html Both files and plots would be good. |
I'm really sorry I didn't see your reply because I'm busy with some other thing. |
hello, I run the code 'trl.m' for my data, but it appears many burrs in the calculated curve. the curve is centered around the DUT with pad and line simulation line and it don't show any calibration effect.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: