Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Tracker] : Breaking Changes in API #837

Open
shubham-cmyk opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[Tracker] : Breaking Changes in API #837

shubham-cmyk opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@shubham-cmyk
Copy link
Member

shubham-cmyk commented Feb 9, 2024

A tracker to collect the breaking changes in API's in the next major release.

@shubham-cmyk shubham-cmyk added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 9, 2024
@eddycharly eddycharly added this to the v0.2.0 milestone Feb 24, 2024
@chipzoller
Copy link
Contributor

chipzoller commented Mar 3, 2024

You may want to standardize on how to refer to existing cluster resources across all operations so you avoid having to do this:

  - name: 04 - Delete good PDBs
    try:
    - delete:
        ref:
          apiVersion: policy/v1
          kind: PodDisruptionBudget
          name: good-pdb01
  - name: 05 - Update existing Deployments to have one replica
    try:
    - patch:
        resource:
          apiVersion: apps/v1
          kind: Deployment
          metadata:
            name: alpha-busybox
          spec:
            replicas: 1

Note ref versus resource when both operations refer to an existing cluster resource.

@eddycharly eddycharly modified the milestones: v0.2.0, v0.2.1 Apr 19, 2024
@eddycharly eddycharly modified the milestones: v0.2.1, v0.2.2, v0.2.3 May 15, 2024
@eddycharly eddycharly modified the milestones: v0.2.3, v0.2.4 May 23, 2024
@eddycharly
Copy link
Member

separate test and config in two different groups

i don't remember why we wanted that 🤔

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants