-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 700
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
KEP-2170: Migrate the container resource calculation mechanism to k/k library #2280
Comments
How would this work with version skew? Do we migrate to this once 1.32 is the last version supported? |
I will switch to k/k library once 1.32.0 is released. |
But, we can use the 1.32.0 after the next kubeflow release since the v1.32 is out of the scope of the next kubeflow release. |
sorry I am a bit confused. Are you saying that if I am running k8s 1.31, kubeflow (once upgraded to v1.32) is not supported in this case? I can install kubeflow on various versions of kubernetes so I was thinking that if 1.29, 1.30 and 1.31 are still in support, do we need to make sure that Kubeflow can be installed/functional on those? I guess for v2, we could say that this only supported on k8s 1.32 and on. |
As you can see here: https://www.kubeflow.org/docs/releases/kubeflow-1.9/ So, I guess that the next supported versions are 1.29 - 1.31. |
I guess that this is so challenging since we need to prepare additional verification infrastructure and go modules and more. |
/remove-label lifecycle/needs-triage |
What you would like to be added?
Currently, we depend on the Kueue container resource request calculation mechanism since the k/k mechanism is not exposed to the third part repositories.
training-operator/pkg/runtime.v2/runtime.go
Lines 124 to 125 in 22da8af
But, after the k/k v1.32, we can use the container resource computation library in any repositories: kubernetes/kubernetes#124609
Why is this needed?
Reducing dependencies would be better.
Love this feature?
Give it a 👍 We prioritize the features with most 👍
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: