v1.0.0-rc.2 #83
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
At this point, I think we are feature locked for the release, and there aren't any known code changes that are needed. That being said, if there's anything you find that should be fixed before the first release, we are still open to PR's! The main focus before the release now is documentation. @alsantangelo would you be able review the current README files for any changes you think we should make:
I'm not sure whether we want to hold up release 1.0.0 for this, but we should also start looking to lock down standards/expectations for the xml comments @Frueber has started implementing in files like this and make that a target for one of the upcoming releases: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I tried to integrate this into an existing set of tests, and I discovered a couple features we'll need for release 1.0 to be useful:
Without these, we don't really have something that's usable until a later version. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Doing more testing, HealthCheckAttribute needs updated, TimeSpan and int? are not valid types for an attribute. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This is the second release candidate for this package before the 1.0 release. The minimum requirements were to implement an Sftp server that could be stood up for testing, and allow files to be added or removed as needed.
The focus of this release was to clean up exposed api's before our first release.
Changes since the last release include:
This discussion was created from the release v1.0.0-rc.2.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions