local adaptation dir

[Jrodriguez216]

I've added my current slim script of NWF Local Adaptation, along with a brief ReadMe and the toy image of heterogenous landscape.

[bhaller]

Hi! I'm just wondering what the context is for this. Is this being added to the paper, or is it a repo-only addition? Will there be more of this kind of thing showing up over time? I thought the paper was submitted to a journal already, and I haven't seen any chat about post-submission revisions. I'm rather swamped with work right now, so I guess I'm wondering what the urgency is for this, and whether I ought to be expecting more on the way. :-> Thanks!

[silastittes]

Hi! I'm just wondering what the context is for this. Is this being added to the paper, or is it a repo-only addition? Will there be more of this kind of thing showing up over time? I thought the paper was submitted to a journal already, and I haven't seen any chat about post-submission revisions. I'm rather swamped with work right now, so I guess I'm wondering what the urgency is for this, and whether I ought to be expecting more on the way. :-> Thanks!

Hey @bhaller! @Jrodriguez216 was working on this for a separate project, but I thought it was cool and could be a nice addition to this catalogue, so encouraged her to PR. No plans to incorporate it into the paper. Don't imagine a ton more of these will be coming down the pipes any time soon. If we want to leave this repo as a reflection of what's in the paper, I think that's fine. No rush. Just thought it would be good to get eyes on it from the pros since really only her and I have spent time on it.

[bhaller]

Hey @bhaller!

Hi @silastittes! Aha, I see. :->

If we want to leave this repo as a reflection of what's in the paper, I think that's fine.

I have no opinion on that one way or the other, so far (will need to think on it and hear people's thoughts); but maybe a good question for the group?

No rush. Just thought it would be good to get eyes on it from the pros since really only her and I have spent time on it.

Gotcha. I'll circle back to it once I've handled some other things, then; quite snowed under at present. :->

[silastittes]

Hey @bhaller!

Hi @silastittes! Aha, I see. :->

If we want to leave this repo as a reflection of what's in the paper, I think that's fine.

I have no opinion on that one way or the other, so far (will need to think on it and hear people's thoughts); but maybe a good question for the group?

Agree it's worth seeing what team wants to do in that regard!

No rush. Just thought it would be good to get eyes on it from the pros since really only her and I have spent time on it.

Gotcha. I'll circle back to it once I've handled some other things, then; quite snowed under at present. :->

Awesome, I think @Jrodriguez216 can move forward with what she's got, but greatly appreciated if/when bandwidth allows.

[Jrodriguez216]

Hey @bhaller!

Hi @silastittes! Aha, I see. :->

If we want to leave this repo as a reflection of what's in the paper, I think that's fine.

I have no opinion on that one way or the other, so far (will need to think on it and hear people's thoughts); but maybe a good question for the group?

Agree it's worth seeing what team wants to do in that regard!

No rush. Just thought it would be good to get eyes on it from the pros since really only her and I have spent time on it.

Gotcha. I'll circle back to it once I've handled some other things, then; quite snowed under at present. :->

Awesome, I think @Jrodriguez216 can move forward with what she's got, but greatly appreciated if/when bandwidth allows.

Yes, thanks for the speedy replies @silastittes, and thanks for your consideration @bhaller, no rush or worries! :)

[bhaller]

Gotcha. I'll circle back to it once I've handled some other things, then; quite snowed under at present. :->

Awesome, I think @Jrodriguez216 can move forward with what she's got, but greatly appreciated if/when bandwidth allows.

Hey folks. I'm a little less slammed now, briefly. :-> Is this review still needed, and is this still the right place to do it?

[silastittes]

Gotcha. I'll circle back to it once I've handled some other things, then; quite snowed under at present. :->

Awesome, I think @Jrodriguez216 can move forward with what she's got, but greatly appreciated if/when bandwidth allows.

Hey folks. I'm a little less slammed now, briefly. :-> Is this review still needed, and is this still the right place to do it?

Yes based on slack convo, I think here is good! Any more commits to push first @Jrodriguez216?

[bhaller]

Some thoughts, I hope they're helpful. Sorry this took me so long; life is busy right now...

[silastittes]

Thank you for the thorough review @bhaller! I will check in with @Jrodriguez216! Pondering the optimum issue you raised. Maybe have a question or too soon.

[Jrodriguez216]

Thanks @bhaller !!! I'll be going through this today

[Jrodriguez216]

All changes made :)