Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stuck at "PVR manager is starting up at 0%" on Dreambox with new security measures #308

Open
AndKe opened this issue Nov 20, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels

Comments

@AndKe
Copy link

AndKe commented Nov 20, 2020

Situation:
DM900UHD, stock software
Fresh installed plugin on Kodi.
Only plugin configuration changed is the IP address of my Dreambox.
On any attempt to enter [TV] then [Channels] on Kodi, the message "PVR manager is starting up at 0%" is displayed, and there is no progress.

Solution:
With great help from the author of the plugin, these two settings were found to cause the trouble:
In Dreambox Menu -> Settings -> Network -> Web interface
Token-based security: Off
Simple anti-hijack measure: Off

Additional information: Should you disable the webinterface, and enable it at a later time, these settings will revert to "on" (causing trouble again)

@phunkyfish phunkyfish changed the title Stuck at "PVR manager is starting up at 0%" message Stuck at "PVR manager is starting up at 0%" on Dreambox with new security measures Nov 20, 2020
@petzi-opi
Copy link

Setup: Dream two ultra hd over LAN to firestick mit enigma2. Das hat mit der DM920 super funktioniert, da waren ebenfalls die oben besprochenen Einstellungen Token-based security: Off, Simple anti-hijack measure: Off, erforderlich.
Bei der two funktioniert das aber nicht mehr. Unnötig zu sagen, dass der event log leer ist...

grafik

@wolfia1
Copy link

wolfia1 commented Oct 14, 2021

Funktioniert Prima Danke. Leider ein Problem die Sky Sender möchte er auf Kodi nicht abspielen kann da jemand helfen?

@phunkyfish
Copy link
Member

Sorry, don’t speak German.

@petzi-opi
Copy link

petzi-opi commented Oct 15, 2021

@Guancheng-Li
Copy link

I just bypassed the problem in this way:
#278 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants