You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some users reported that the UX is confusing for the losing side of a dispute who may want to appeal. The timeline shows the overall appeal duration period, which is most relevant to the winning side, but rather misleading for the losing side.
Note
The screen below does show the correct information for both sides, but the point is that the image above remains misleading.
Possible solution
The easiest is to add a mention "(for the winning side)" next to Appeal here, and possibly add another label for relevant to the losing side (either by giving the losing side appeal duration, or either by redirecting them to the correct info).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jaybuidl
changed the title
Add the losing side appeal duration on the dispute timeline
Add the losing side appeal duration on the dispute periods timeline
Sep 9, 2022
The issue here with this is that the Court is agnostic to how the appeal system of the Arbitrable works. The Arbitrable might allow sniping appeals, or not appeals at all, or use other exotic systems.
In practice, this has never been the case, as all Arbitrables respect the 1/2 appeal period for loser side. So it could be added to the interface
I'd close this as wontfix since solving this is in scope for kleros-v2, and there's no elegant solution to the problem
Issue
Some users reported that the UX is confusing for the losing side of a dispute who may want to appeal. The timeline shows the overall appeal duration period, which is most relevant to the winning side, but rather misleading for the losing side.
Note
The screen below does show the correct information for both sides, but the point is that the image above remains misleading.
Possible solution
The easiest is to add a mention "(for the winning side)" next to Appeal here, and possibly add another label for relevant to the losing side (either by giving the losing side appeal duration, or either by redirecting them to the correct info).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: