Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Colours differ between sections of the underlighting on Gemini #377

Open
al45tair opened this issue Nov 16, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Colours differ between sections of the underlighting on Gemini #377

al45tair opened this issue Nov 16, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@al45tair
Copy link

al45tair commented Nov 16, 2019

  • Device: Gemini Dusk
  • Firmware Origin: Any (all exhibit this problem)
  • OS: Any (this isn't an OS issue)
  • Version: 1191
  • Reproduction Steps:
    Set the underlighting; some colours work better than others.
  • Resulting Issue:
    The back half of the under lighting renders colours differently to the front half.

For instance, (25,97,212) is noticeably more purple on the back half of the underlighting (LEDs 113 to 128) than it is on the front half (129 to 144).

Similarly, I did this:

A[snooze] <= framedelay:16, framestretch, loop, replace:clear, pfunc: interp;
A[snooze, 1] <= P[113](0,0,0), P[144](0,0,0);
A[snooze, 2] <= P[113](15,15,15), P[144](15,15,15);
A[snooze, 3] <= P[113](31,31,31), P[144](31,31,31);
A[snooze, 4] <= P[113](47,47,47), P[144](47,47,47);
A[snooze, 5] <= P[113](63,63,63), P[144](63,63,63);
A[snooze, 6] <= P[113](79,79,79), P[144](79,79,79);
A[snooze, 7] <= P[113](95,95,95), P[144](95,95,95);
A[snooze, 8] <= P[113](111,111,111), P[144](111,111,111);
A[snooze, 9] <= P[113](127,127,127), P[144](127,127,127);
A[snooze, 10] <= P[113](111,111,111), P[144](111,111,111);
A[snooze, 11] <= P[113](95,95,95), P[144](95,95,95);
A[snooze, 12] <= P[113](79,79,79), P[144](79,79,79);
A[snooze, 13] <= P[113](63,63,63), P[144](63,63,63);
A[snooze, 14] <= P[113](47,47,47), P[144](47,47,47);
A[snooze, 15] <= P[113](31,31,31), P[144](31,31,31);
A[snooze, 16] <= P[113](15,15,15), P[144](15,15,15);

and found that the back half seemed to go black out of step with (and for longer than) the front half, I'm assuming because it has a different gamma curve or some such.

@al45tair
Copy link
Author

Turning off gamma correction fixes the issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant