Replies: 3 comments 4 replies
-
btw, other workarounds I have used in the past include using things like |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Is the limitation here that you need your non-standard entity to be a directory name as well as in the file name? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes that's one limitation, I guess another is similar to something you brought up earlier that was discussed re: relative placement of the entities -- in that context it was to ensure |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There are a number of scenarios where you may not have subject-specific file naming, but still want to have BIDS-style names, and have another entity effectively take the place of
subject
.e.g. for templates (
tpl-{template}
)(see here for examples: https://www.templateflow.org/browse/)
or for aggregate data.
In existing workflows I have used the
prefix=
keyword inbids()
to emulate this, but it is a bit hacky as you would have to include something like:prefix=f'tpl-{template}/tpl-{template}_'
Any thoughts on (ideally non-breaking) changes that we could introduce to accommodate this?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions