Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bulk data imports #311

Closed
molomby opened this issue Sep 14, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed

Bulk data imports #311

molomby opened this issue Sep 14, 2018 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@molomby
Copy link
Member

molomby commented Sep 14, 2018

The ability to consume item data in bulk.

Like exports (#310), this functionality changes significantly with scale; it's easy to do a small dinky version of this but throwing significant bulk at it will have the potential to destabilise an app.

Also like exports, imports can be run at the app layer (ie. in node; requiring uploads, background workers, temp files, batching, etc.) or using DB-level tools.

Import functionality may form part of our upgrade strategy for KS4 apps; ie. import from a mongo instance (eg. users could provide connection details in the admin UI).

  • Import formats? Excel, JSON, CSV
  • Import from existing Keystone instance/MongoDB?
  • Specific access control for this or just use create permissions?
@molomby molomby added this to the M5: Later milestone Sep 14, 2018
@molomby
Copy link
Member Author

molomby commented Nov 12, 2018

Could be related to #301, depending on how we approach it.

@VinayaSathyanarayana
Copy link
Contributor

CSV/JSON import will be a useful feature

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 21, 2019

It looks like you haven't had a response in over 3 months. Sorry about that! We've flagged this issue for special attention. It wil be manually reviewed by maintainers, not automatically closed. If you have any additional information please leave us a comment. It really helps! Thank you for you contributions. :)

@stale stale bot added the needs-review label Sep 21, 2019
@MadeByMike
Copy link
Contributor

@molomby did we conclude that stuff in #301 is stuff Keystone should do (or assist with), but bulk imports like this are not a Keystone concern?

@stale stale bot removed the needs-review label Oct 18, 2019
@gautamsi
Copy link
Member

We can use extension or custom action approach to have this. https://github.com/keystonejs/keystone-5/issues/1739

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Feb 15, 2020

It looks like there hasn't been any activity here in over 6 months. Sorry about that! We've flagged this issue for special attention. It wil be manually reviewed by maintainers, not automatically closed. If you have any additional information please leave us a comment. It really helps! Thank you for you contribution. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants