Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 16, 2022. It is now read-only.

Keycloak operator using old version of Openshift API package #498

Closed
psav opened this issue Feb 28, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Keycloak operator using old version of Openshift API package #498

psav opened this issue Feb 28, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@psav
Copy link

psav commented Feb 28, 2022

Describe the bug

In trying to write an operator that uses the Keycloak types to create resources, I run into a problem where it can no longer download the openshift API package because of a missing tag 3.9.0. After talking to a representative from OpenShift, they recommend that Keycloak update their OpenShift library version.

Also, since the tag on the repo for the latest is v17.0.0, it cannot be used as a golang version in importing, as there is no corresponding v17 folder.

Version

17.0.0

Expected behavior

No response

Actual behavior

No response

How to Reproduce?

Create a go project and try to import the keycloak operator package.

Anything else?

No response

@andreaTP
Copy link
Contributor

andreaTP commented Mar 2, 2022

Hi @psav ,

thanks for opening this issue, the Keycloak operator has not been developed to be a valid "dependency".
We are also moving to a new Java Operator for the new Keycloak Quarkus distribution ( here the design proposal ).

Do you want to elaborate a little further on the concrete use-case you are trying to address?

@andreaTP andreaTP self-assigned this Mar 2, 2022
@stianst
Copy link
Contributor

stianst commented Nov 16, 2022

Thanks (again) for reporting this issue. Keycloak 19 was the last version that included this legacy Operator, and with the release of Keycloak 20 the Operator reached EOL and this repository will be archived, please see our blog post on this topic. If this issue is still valid for the Realm Operator, please re-open it there. Thanks for your understanding. And be sure to check out our new Operator!

@stianst stianst closed this as completed Nov 16, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants