You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When creating ScaledObject from the OCP Console, it is not possible to specify trigger-specific fields such as the serverAddress and the metricName for the Prometheus scaler. As such, it is not possible to create a valid ScaledObject from the Console without having to modify the resource afterward.
Expected Behavior
I would have expected to be able to configure a valid Prometheus trigger from the OCP Console.
Actual Behavior
These were the only fields I was able to configure:
From a UX perspective, I would've expected the type field to be a drop-down list where I could have chosen the type I wanted to use, and then it would have displayed the scaler-specific fields for me to configure.
Steps to Reproduce the Problem
Install Keda via OLM
Create ScaledObject from the Console
Specifications
KEDA OLM Operator Version: latest
KEDA Version: 2.4.0
Platform & Version: 4.10
Kubernetes Version: 1.22
OLM Version:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Agree, that would be really nice, the problematic part is that trigger metadata are map[string]string thus it is not that straightforward to implement this request :(
When creating ScaledObject from the OCP Console, it is not possible to specify trigger-specific fields such as the
serverAddress
and themetricName
for the Prometheus scaler. As such, it is not possible to create a valid ScaledObject from the Console without having to modify the resource afterward.Expected Behavior
I would have expected to be able to configure a valid Prometheus trigger from the OCP Console.
Actual Behavior
These were the only fields I was able to configure:
From a UX perspective, I would've expected the type field to be a drop-down list where I could have chosen the type I wanted to use, and then it would have displayed the scaler-specific fields for me to configure.
Steps to Reproduce the Problem
Specifications
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: