You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
It would be highly useful to be able to assign access rights for Item Parts (images+annotations+transcriptions) to users. In this way, an annotator could upload images from a fragments that other annotators are not allowed to see.
Cheers,
Alicia
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is an interesting suggestion and not something we've come across as a need. Can you give some use-cases, please? In what situation would you not want other annotators to see a fragment?
It might be that a researchers have the images of some manuscript fragment from an institution but they don't have the permissions to share it with others. In this case, if they want to work on it in Archetype, they need to be sure that other annotators cannot access those images
I see the point of this. The assumption in Archetype's design is that each project has its own instance, and so all those with editing rights have access to all material. I can see exceptions but this would require a more complex rights-management system I think, which would be useful but is for another stage.
Hi,
It would be highly useful to be able to assign access rights for Item Parts (images+annotations+transcriptions) to users. In this way, an annotator could upload images from a fragments that other annotators are not allowed to see.
Cheers,
Alicia
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: