Idea: add custom local model(HTTP backend) for complex agents #384
nfedyashev
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
At the user-level that's one way to do it, yeah. But this functionality should exist in gptel first, and I won't know if it fits in the backend framework until I implement a few of them. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
depending on how hard it might be to add such feature custom(local) models might be a really powerful way of not just using LLMs but building own custom agentic workflows on top of it.
For gptel it could be just like another backend to send HTTP requests to.
Custom HTTP backend could have any kind of workflow - knowledge base injection, tool use, custom guard rails etc. As long as it responds in the expected format, it is fine.
Somewhat related issue #379 but in this case user is not limited to AWS Lambda as only action group option like AWS Bedrock limits it.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions