Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hybrid-cloud-patterns.io seems deprecated for validatedpatterns.io #3485

Closed
adelton opened this issue Nov 1, 2023 · 6 comments
Closed

hybrid-cloud-patterns.io seems deprecated for validatedpatterns.io #3485

adelton opened this issue Nov 1, 2023 · 6 comments

Comments

@adelton
Copy link

adelton commented Nov 1, 2023

The site https://hybrid-cloud-patterns.io/ which is mentioned for example at https://operatorhub.io/operator/patterns-operator says "Redirecting you to the new Validated Patterns site" and redirects to https://validatedpatterns.io/.

The occurrences of "hybrid-cloud-patterns.io", like those found by https://github.com/search?q=org%3Ak8s-operatorhub+hybrid-cloud-patterns.io&type=code, should likely be changed to the new location of that activity.

@adelton
Copy link
Author

adelton commented Nov 1, 2023

For the record, the URL is wrong on https://operatorhub.io/operator/patterns-operator but when installing the Validated Patterns Operator (version 0.0.32) from OperatorHub via my OpenShift cluster console, the

Deploys and manages architecture patterns from https://validatedpatterns.io

is shown.

Does this mean this repo is not the correct upstream for this operator?

@Denney-tech
Copy link

I'm not a maintainer here, so take this with a grain of salt.

This is an upstream issue; it's their responsibility to submit PR's for new versions of their operator. The one in the community catalog hasn't been updated since last year. The version here is 0.0.1, and upstream is tagged up to 0.0.33. They don't have any CI setup to automatically submit PR's here like some others do (like the awx-operator for e.g.). Versioned content is generally expected to be immutable, so even if the upstream submits updated PR's, I wouldn't necessarily expect or allow the 0.0.1 version to be changed retroactively. You would just install or upgrade to the latest version, and the documentation would reflect the updated descriptions in the latest version (which your particular issue is already fixed upstream).

You might check with @beekhof if he has any comment on the matter since he submitted the initial version here, and appears to still work on Validated Patterns repositories. Otherwise submit an issue upstream.

@adelton
Copy link
Author

adelton commented Dec 12, 2023

Thanks, I filed validatedpatterns/patterns-operator#151 now.

Copy link
Contributor

This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

Copy link
Contributor

This issue was closed because it has been inactive for 30 days since being marked as stale.

@adelton
Copy link
Author

adelton commented Feb 14, 2024

I don't mind this issue getting closed but I object to the completed reason / resolution that the bot added. It should be something like NOTABUG / WONTFIX / whatever this project uses.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants