Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem about the results compared with Middlebury displayed results #58

Open
wujunjie15 opened this issue Nov 13, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@wujunjie15
Copy link

Hi,
Thanks for your code, and after I ran the slow network to predict the trainingH datasets, I got much worser results than the results displayed on the Middlebury website, I wonder where I did something wrong, can you help me out ?
The command is as follows:
./main.lua mb slow -a predict -net_fname net/net_mb_slow_-a_train_all.t7 -left im0.png -right im1.png -disp_max 380
And one of the results can be compared as follows: The error rate(nocc) for Vintage by running the code is 31% while the result of Vintage image on Middlebury (MC-CNN-acrt ) is 24.8%.
Do I miss something important? Thanks a lot !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant