You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
Thanks for your code, and after I ran the slow network to predict the trainingH datasets, I got much worser results than the results displayed on the Middlebury website, I wonder where I did something wrong, can you help me out ?
The command is as follows:
./main.lua mb slow -a predict -net_fname net/net_mb_slow_-a_train_all.t7 -left im0.png -right im1.png -disp_max 380
And one of the results can be compared as follows: The error rate(nocc) for Vintage by running the code is 31% while the result of Vintage image on Middlebury (MC-CNN-acrt ) is 24.8%.
Do I miss something important? Thanks a lot !
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Thanks for your code, and after I ran the slow network to predict the trainingH datasets, I got much worser results than the results displayed on the Middlebury website, I wonder where I did something wrong, can you help me out ?
The command is as follows:
./main.lua mb slow -a predict -net_fname net/net_mb_slow_-a_train_all.t7 -left im0.png -right im1.png -disp_max 380
And one of the results can be compared as follows: The error rate(nocc) for Vintage by running the code is 31% while the result of Vintage image on Middlebury (MC-CNN-acrt ) is 24.8%.
Do I miss something important? Thanks a lot !
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: