-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is it possible to provide other language implementation? #74
Comments
I'm using dynamicTest of Junit5, it's works, thanks. |
This suite is defined in plain JSON, which should be readable in just about every language. You'll have to build your own test runner though. My implementation is .Net, so I had to build a runner that reads the |
I also did something similar to @gregsdennis in |
It's nice to see the different implementations for the new proposed standard. I'm wondering if there is a good place to put a list of implementations for RFC9535. |
I'm not aware of one, but this table would be an appropriate place to have such a list https://cburgmer.github.io/json-path-comparison/ |
I'll see if I can motivate adding a section for implementations that are supposed to be conformant with the new proposed standard. |
I already have cburgmer/json-path-comparison#130, but it seems that work on that repo has waned since the spec was released. I think it was intended as just a tool to inform the spec. |
Motivation:
I'm using Java, is it possible to provide a suite for Java, thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: