Error on periodic request

[btsteve]

I am getting this on the worker node.
[2016-05-23T20:13:23.367950 #22356] INFO -- : Started GET "/periodicworker" for 127.0.0.1 at 2016-05-23 20:13:23 +0000
F, [2016-05-23T20:13:23.369923 #22356] FATAL -- :
ActionController::RoutingError (No route matches [GET] "/periodicworker"):
actionpack (4.2.1) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/debug_exceptions.rb:21:in call' actionpack (4.2.1) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/show_exceptions.rb:30:incall'
railties (4.2.1) lib/rails/rack/logger.rb:38:in call_app' railties (4.2.1) lib/rails/rack/logger.rb:20:inblock in call'
activesupport (4.2.1) lib/active_support/tagged_logging.rb:68:in block in tagged' activesupport (4.2.1) lib/active_support/tagged_logging.rb:26:intagged'
activesupport (4.2.1) lib/active_support/tagged_logging.rb:68:in tagged' railties (4.2.1) lib/rails/rack/logger.rb:20:incall'
actionpack (4.2.1) lib/action_dispatch/middleware/request_id.rb:21:in call' rack (1.6.4) lib/rack/methodoverride.rb:22:incall'
rack (1.6.4) lib/rack/runtime.rb:18:in call' activesupport (4.2.1) lib/active_support/cache/strategy/local_cache_middleware.rb:28:incall'
rack (1.6.4) lib/rack/sendfile.rb:113:in call' railties (4.2.1) lib/rails/engine.rb:518:incall'
railties (4.2.1) lib/rails/application.rb:164:in call' passenger (4.0.59) lib/phusion_passenger/rack/thread_handler_extension.rb:74:inprocess_request'
passenger (4.0.59) lib/phusion_passenger/request_handler/thread_handler.rb:141:in `accept_and_process_next_request'

[jros2300]

I've been testing the worker environment and it is working.

Please, can you create a full snapshot of the beanstalk logs and send them to me? ([email protected])

http://docs.aws.amazon.com/elasticbeanstalk/latest/dg/using-features.logging.html

[btsteve]

Here you go.
Thanks

BundleLogs-1464108389181.zip
BundleLogs-1464108374530.zip

[jros2300]

I don't see those errors in the logs, in any case I've uploaded a new version, can you redeploy the cloudformation template?

[btsteve]

Yes thanks, Will update you soon.
Thanks for the help.

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Javier ros [email protected]
wrote:

I don't see those errors in the logs, in any case I've uploaded a new
version, can you redeploy the cloudformation template?

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#8 (comment)

[btsteve]

Still not getting any recommendations.

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Travis Stevens [email protected] wrote:

Yes thanks, Will update you soon.
Thanks for the help.

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Javier ros [email protected]
wrote:

I don't see those errors in the logs, in any case I've uploaded a new
version, can you redeploy the cloudformation template?

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#8 (comment)

[jros2300]

So you're not getting any recommendation in the web, that's not related with the periodic job.

Do you see any line in the Summary in red?, are the instances in other AZ or instance type to move the unused RIs?

[btsteve]

So currently we do not have any reserve instances. We were hoping the tool
would make recommendations.

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Javier ros [email protected]
wrote:

So you're not getting any recommendation in the web, that's not related
with the periodic job.

Do you see any line in the Summary in red?, are the instances in other AZ
or instance type to move the unused RIs?

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#8 (comment)

[btsteve]

WHen the s3importer tries to run i see this

I, [2016-05-25T14:07:59.262114 #3255] INFO -- : Started POST "/s3importer"
for 127.0.0.1 at 2016-05-25 14:07:59 +0000
I, [2016-05-25T14:07:59.263881 #3255] INFO -- : Processing by
SummaryController#s3importer as HTML
I, [2016-05-25T14:07:59.263929 #3255] INFO -- : Parameters:
{"summary"=>{}}
D, [2016-05-25T14:07:59.265900 #3255] DEBUG -- : Setup Load (1.3ms)
SELECT setups.* FROM setups ORDER BY setups.id ASC LIMIT 1
D, [2016-05-25T14:07:59.266253 #3255] DEBUG -- : CACHE (0.0ms) SELECT
setups.* FROM setups ORDER BY setups.id ASC LIMIT 1
D, [2016-05-25T14:07:59.266509 #3255] DEBUG -- : CACHE (0.0ms) SELECT
setups.* FROM setups ORDER BY setups.id ASC LIMIT 1
D, [2016-05-25T14:07:59.308135 #3255] DEBUG -- : Error
I, [2016-05-25T14:07:59.308400 #3255] INFO -- : Rendered text template
(0.0ms)
I, [2016-05-25T14:07:59.308586 #3255] INFO -- : Completed 200 OK in 45ms
(Views: 0.3ms | ActiveRecord: 1.3ms)

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Travis Stevens [email protected] wrote:

So currently we do not have any reserve instances. We were hoping the tool
would make recommendations.

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Javier ros [email protected]
wrote:

So you're not getting any recommendation in the web, that's not related
with the periodic job.

Do you see any line in the Summary in red?, are the instances in other AZ
or instance type to move the unused RIs?

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#8 (comment)

[jros2300]

No, the tool doesn't recommend new reserved instances, this tool helps to maintain the reserved instances used.

For recommendations you can use trusted advisor.

[btsteve]

Ok that that helps.

What format do you need to use for the DBR bucket name?
I has using dsad-dbr currently and it does not seen to be importing.

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Javier ros [email protected]
wrote:

No, the tool doesn't recommend new reserved instances, this tool helps to
maintain the reserved instances used.

For recommendations you can use trusted advisor.

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#8 (comment)