Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scala 2.10 #27

Open
adam00s opened this issue Jan 21, 2013 · 5 comments
Open

Scala 2.10 #27

adam00s opened this issue Jan 21, 2013 · 5 comments

Comments

@adam00s
Copy link

adam00s commented Jan 21, 2013

Final Scala 2.10 was published a while ago, it could be nice to have scala-time compiled for it on maven repositories.

@kordzik
Copy link

kordzik commented Jan 24, 2013

+1 (where's issue voting :P)

@zeljkot
Copy link

zeljkot commented Mar 6, 2013

+1

@holograph
Copy link

scala-time appears to be abandoned, and has been forked into an actively-maintained project called nscala-time; see the GitHub repository: https://github.com/nscala-time/nscala-time

@skestle
Copy link

skestle commented Apr 10, 2014

So it seems that this works, but not as specified on the packet.

Instead of "libraryDependencies += "org.scalaj" %% "scalaj-time" % "0.7"" you need to use "libraryDependencies += "org.scalaj" % "scalaj-time_2.10.2" % "0.7""

Since scala-time seems to deploy with full scala versions that sbt 0.13 doesn't seem to do - see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22975763/sbt-disagreeing-with-library-about-scala-version

Also, it's a shame about the nscala-time "fork", since it's not a fork: nscala-time/nscala-time#56
I would love to see it on the network graph along with the rest of the community.

Once the publishing is fixed up, this can be closed.

@skestle
Copy link

skestle commented Apr 22, 2014

It seems that this changed in scala 2.10. See http://www.scala-sbt.org/release/docs/Detailed-Topics/Cross-Build for details.

The better way of resolving the dependency until this is fixed is

libraryDependencies += "org.scalaj" % "scalaj-time" % "0.7" cross Crossversion.full

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants